“I don’t wear condoms because I want someone with AIDS like me”

This was the second time she had a relationship with him. The first time, in 1994, there was only one report. Indeed, he did not protect himself when he learned that he was injured. You won’t get anything this time.

The accused learned of his contamination in 1993 while attending military service classes. He stayed there for a few days and then went out for medical reasons. He learns from the military doctor that he has HIV.

I asked him if he had a condom but he replied that he is allergic and that he is not sick and I have nothing to fear‘,” the victim explains to the court Thursday morning about his first report in 2002.

Then begins her long way to the cross. Despite everything, she remains gentle with him and wonders if he knows he’s injured. In 2006, she did research to find him and found articles related to the rape he was accused of and then sentenced in 2009 to 12 years in prison.

Explain to the court the ordeal you are going through

Find the passages in which the accused explains his thirst for revenge. She decided to file a complaint on her own and then contact the lawyer who defended her rape victim. There is a procedure in place.

Eric M. will be indicted and returned to the Assize Court in November 2021. The trial was initially postponed, and the trial began on Thursday, May 12, 2022. She explains to the court the ordeal she has been experiencing since then, both in her love life and in his daily life.

The forensic expert confirms that there is no doubt that the referral belongs to the accused. The sequence is 99% identical.

Moreover, the victim is clear: his relationship before and after Eric M. is negative, and it can only come from him. “I can’t date, but it was tainted before 2003″expert says.

The professor responsible for comparing the two strains also unanimously agreed: “It’s 99% very likely that one contaminated the other“.

“He told me he wanted revenge on a girl who hurt him.”

The testimonies of the victim’s ex-girlfriends highlight the same elements: the accused did not tell them that he was infected, and, worse, did not want to wear a condom. Most of the time they were learning.who – whichby his family.

However, one testimony emerged Thursday morning: the young woman who was the victim of the accused’s rape. She was a minor at the time of events, and this time again, he didn’t protect himself. “My friend’s brother raped me. He said he wanted to take revenge on a girl who injured him and take him to all the girls’,” she explains bravely at the bar. The same words he said in police custody after the rape.

The accused managed to speak at the beginning of the era, to interrogate the President of the Republic. It turns out that he had multiple relationships and only protected himself if he was forced to. According to him, he knew he was a carrier but did not know he could transmit it, as indicated by his companion who was with him when the victim was injured but was likely to remain passive. “You know how it was taken because you say you picked it up from a womanThe president says, “The tragedy is that the mother of his children died in 2001 of AIDS, and it was he who infected her.

“I don’t wear condoms because I want someone with AIDS like me”

“I have hate, his death only made me more angry. I want revenge more. I don’t wear condoms because I want someone with AIDS like me. She’s a woman who gave it to me, and that’s why he’s a woman I should give it to her.”It is these comments made by the accused during the investigation into the first trial that the attorney general’s office reminds him coldly on Thursday.

Eric M.’s attorney will then focus her questions on the regrets expressed by her client but above all on the lack of intent. She highlights the fact that if her client knew he was infected, there was never any intent:I regret what I did, especially to the victim, because if I moved to him, I didn’t mean to do it knowingly‘,” explains his client.

Only one thing to do: “Protect yourself to protect others”

Obviously, after this first day of the trial, it was his remarks he made in police custody for rape that led him a second time to the criminal court. It is clear that the defendant resented all the young women because he had never accepted that it had happened to him. The boss will explain to him that she understands that he was feeling bad, that his life was an ordeal and that he felt rejected when he learned he had HIV. You will insist on making him say during the discussions that he only has one thing to do: “Protect yourself to protect others.”

The whole case of this trial revolves around the defendant’s intentional transmission of HIV to the victim. Since the transmission is undoubtedly, the ruling issued by the Criminal Court on Friday will be based on the idea of ​​premeditation.

Eric M. , who has arrived at large in court under judicial supervision, could leave tomorrow again in custody. While he was sentenced to 12 years in prison for rape in 2009, this time he faces 15 years in prison.

Leave a Comment